|
Divorce and Alimony
Article 1.
Divorce, Alimony, and Child Support, Generally.
§ 50‑1. Repealed
by Session Laws 1971, c. 1185, s. 20.
§ 50‑2. Bond for costs unnecessary.
It shall not be necessary for either party to a
proceeding for divorce or alimony to give any
undertaking to the other party to secure such costs
as such other party may recover. (1871‑2, c. 193, s.
41; Code, s. 1294; Rev., s. 1558; C.S., s. 1656.)
§ 50‑3. Venue; removal of action.
In all proceedings for divorce, the summons shall be
returnable to the court of the county in which
either the plaintiff or defendant resides.
[In] any action brought under Chapter 50 for alimony
or divorce filed in a county where the plaintiff
resides but the defendant does not reside, where
both parties are residents of the State of North
Carolina, and where the plaintiff removes from the
State and ceases to be a resident, the action may be
removed upon motion of the defendant, for trial or
for any motion in the cause, either before or after
judgment, to the county in which the defendant
resides. The judge, upon such motion, shall order
the removal of the action, and the procedures of
G.S. 1‑87 shall be followed. (1871‑2, c. 193, s. 40;
Code, s. 1289; Rev., s. 1559; 1915, c. 229, s. 1;
C.S., s. 1657; 1977, 2nd Sess., c. 1223.)
§ 50‑4. What marriages may be declared void on
application of either party.
The district court, during a session of court, on
application made as by law provided, by either party
to a marriage contracted contrary to the
prohibitions contained in the Chapter entitled
Marriage, or declared void by said Chapter, may
declare such marriage void from the beginning,
subject, nevertheless, to G.S. 51‑3. (1871‑2, c.
193, s. 33; Code, s. 1283; Rev., s. 1560; C.S., s.
1658; 1945, c. 635; 1971, c. 1185, s. 21; 1973, c.
1; 1979, c. 525, s. 10.)
§ 50‑5. Repealed by Session Laws 1983, c.
613, s. 1.
§ 50‑5.1. Grounds for absolute divorce in cases
of incurable insanity.
In all cases where a husband and wife have lived
separate and apart for three consecutive years,
without cohabitation, and are still so living
separate and apart by reason of the incurable
insanity of one of them, the court may grant a
decree of absolute divorce upon the petition of the
sane spouse: Provided, if the insane spouse has been
released on a trial basis to the custody of his or
her respective spouse such shall not be considered
as terminating the status of living "separate and
apart" nor shall it be considered as constituting
"cohabitation" for the purpose of this section nor
shall it prevent the granting of a divorce as
provided by this section. Provided further, the
evidence shall show that the insane spouse is
suffering from incurable insanity, and has been
confined or examined for three consecutive years
next preceding the bringing of the action in an
institution for the care and treatment of the
mentally disordered or, if not so confined, has been
examined at least three years preceding the
institution of the action for divorce and then found
to be incurably insane as hereinafter provided.
Provided further, that proof of incurable insanity
be supported by the testimony of two reputable
physicians, one of whom shall be a staff member or
the superintendent of the institution where the
insane spouse is confined, and one regularly
practicing physician in the community wherein such
husband and wife reside, who has no connection with
the institution in which said insane spouse is
confined; and provided further that a sworn
statement signed by said staff member or said
superintendent of the institution wherein the insane
spouse is confined or was examined shall be
admissible as evidence of the facts and opinions
therein stated as to the mental status of said
insane spouse and as to whether or not said insane
spouse is suffering from incurable insanity, or the
parties according to the laws governing depositions
may take the deposition of said staff member or
superintendent of the institution wherein the insane
spouse is confined; and provided further that
incurable insanity may be proved by the testimony of
one or more licensed physicians who are members of
the staff of one of this State's accredited
four‑year medical schools or a state‑supported
mental institution, supported by the testimony of
one or more other physicians licensed by the State
of North Carolina, that each of them examined the
allegedly incurable insane spouse at least three
years preceding the institution of the action for
divorce and then determined that said spouse was
suffering from incurable insanity and that one or
more of them examined the allegedly insane spouse
subsequent to the institution of the action and that
in his or their opinion the said allegedly insane
spouse was continuously incurably insane throughout
the full period of three years prior to the
institution of the said action.
In lieu of proof of incurable insanity and
confinement for three consecutive years next
preceding the bringing of the action in an
institution for the care and treatment of the
mentally disordered prescribed in the preceding
paragraph, it shall be sufficient if the evidence
shall show that the allegedly insane spouse was
adjudicated to be insane more than three years
preceding the institution of the action for divorce,
that such insanity has continued without
interruption since such adjudication and that such
person has not been adjudicated to be sane since
such adjudication of insanity; provided, further,
proof of incurable insanity existing after the
institution of the action for divorce shall be
furnished by the testimony of two reputable,
regularly practicing physicians, one of whom shall
be a psychiatrist.
In lieu of proof of incurable insanity and
confinement for three consecutive years next
preceding the bringing of the action in an
institution for the care and treatment of the
mentally disordered, or the adjudication of
insanity, as prescribed in the preceding paragraphs,
it shall be sufficient if the evidence shall show
that the insane spouse was examined by two or more
members of the staff of one of this State's
accredited four‑year medical schools, both of whom
are medical doctors, at least three years preceding
the institution of the action for divorce with a
determination at that time by said staff members
that said spouse is suffering from incurable
insanity, that such insanity has continued without
interruption since such determination; provided,
further, that sworn statements signed by the staff
members of the accredited medical school who
examined the insane spouse at least three years
preceding the commencement of the action shall be
admissible as evidence of the facts and opinions
therein stated as to the mental status of said
insane spouse as to whether or not said insane
spouse was suffering from incurable insanity;
provided, further, that proof of incurable insanity
under this section existing after the institution of
the action for divorce shall be furnished by the
testimony of two reputable physicians, one of whom
shall be a psychiatrist on the staff of one of the
State's accredited four‑year medical schools, and
one a physician practicing regularly in the
community wherein such insane person resides.
In all decrees granted under this subdivision in
actions in which the insane defendant has
insufficient income and property to provide for his
or her own care and maintenance, the court shall
require the plaintiff to provide for the care and
maintenance of the insane defendant for the
defendant's lifetime, based upon the standards set
out in G.S. 50‑16.5(a). The trial court will retain
jurisdiction of the parties and the cause, from term
to term, for the purpose of making such orders as
equity may require to enforce the provisions of the
decree requiring plaintiff to furnish the necessary
funds for such care and maintenance.
Service of process shall be held upon the regular
guardian for said defendant spouse, if any, and if
no regular guardian, upon a duly appointed guardian
ad litem and also upon the superintendent or
physician in charge of the institution wherein the
insane spouse is confined. Such guardian or guardian
ad litem shall make an investigation of the
circumstances and notify the next of kin of the
insane spouse or the superintendent of the
institution of the action and whenever practical
confer with said next of kin before filing
appropriate pleadings in behalf of the defendant.
In all actions brought under this subdivision, if
the jury finds as a fact that the plaintiff has been
guilty of such conduct as has conduced to the
unsoundness of mind of the insane defendant, the
relief prayed for shall be denied.
The plaintiff or defendant must have resided in this
State for six months next preceding institution of
any action under this section. (1945, c. 755; 1949,
c. 264, s. 5; 1953, c. 1087; 1955, c. 887, s. 15;
1963, c. 1173; 1971, c. 1173, ss. 1, 2; 1975, c.
771; 1977, c. 501, s. 1; 1983, c. 613, s. 1.)
§ 50‑6. Divorce after separation of one year on
application of either party.
Marriages may be dissolved and the parties thereto
divorced from the bonds of matrimony on the
application of either party, if and when the husband
and wife have lived separate and apart for one year,
and the plaintiff or defendant in the suit for
divorce has resided in the State for a period of six
months. A divorce under this section shall not be
barred to either party by any defense or plea based
upon any provision of G.S. 50‑7, a plea of res
judicata, or a plea of recrimination.
Notwithstanding the provisions of G.S. 50‑11, or of
the common law, a divorce under this section shall
not affect the rights of a dependent spouse with
respect to alimony which have been asserted in the
action or any other pending action.
Whether there has been a resumption of marital
relations during the period of separation shall be
determined pursuant to G.S. 52‑10.2. Isolated
incidents of sexual intercourse between the parties
shall not toll the statutory period required for
divorce predicated on separation of one year. (1931,
c. 72; 1933, c. 163; 1937, c. 100, ss. 1, 2; 1943,
c. 448, s. 3; 1949, c. 264, s. 3; 1965, c. 636, s.
2; 1977, c. 817, s. 1; 1977, 2nd Sess., c. 1190, s.
1; 1979, c. 709, s. 1; 1981, c. 182; 1983, c. 613,
s. 2; c. 923, s. 217; 1987, c. 664, s. 2.)
§ 50‑7. Grounds for divorce from bed and board.
The court may grant divorces from bed and board on
application of the party injured, made as by law
provided, in the following cases if either party:
- Abandons his or her family.
- Maliciously turns the other out of doors.
- By cruel or barbarous treatment endangers
the life of the other. In addition, the court
may grant the victim of such treatment the
remedies available under G.S. 50B‑1, et seq.
- Offers such indignities to the person of the
other as to render his or her condition
intolerable and life burdensome.
- Becomes an excessive user of alcohol or
drugs so as to render the condition of the other
spouse intolerable and the life of that spouse
burdensome.
- Commits adultery. (1871‑2, c. 193, s. 36;
Code, s. 1286; Rev., s. 1562; C.S., s. 1660;
1967, c. 1152, s. 7; 1971, c. 1185, s. 22; 1979,
c. 561, s. 5; 1985, c. 574, ss. 1, 2.)
§ 50‑8. Contents
of complaint; verification; venue and service in
action by nonresident; certain divorces validated.
In all actions for divorce the complaint shall
be verified in accordance with the provisions of
Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and G.S.
1‑148. The plaintiff shall set forth in his or her
complaint that the complainant or defendant has been
a resident of the State of North Carolina for at
least six months next preceding the filing of the
complaint, and that the facts set forth therein as
grounds for divorce, except in actions for divorce
from bed and board, have existed to his or her
knowledge for at least six months prior to the
filing of the complaint: Provided, however, that if
the cause for divorce is one‑year separation, then
it shall not be necessary to allege in the complaint
that the grounds for divorce have existed for at
least six months prior to the filing of the
complaint; it being the purpose of this proviso to
permit a divorce after such separation of one year
without awaiting an additional six months for filing
the complaint: Provided, further, that if the
complainant is a nonresident of the State action
shall be brought in the county of the defendant's
residence, and summons served upon the defendant
personally or service of summons accepted by the
defendant personally in the manner provided in G.S.
1A‑1, Rule 4(j)(1). Notwithstanding any other
provision of this section, any suit or action for
divorce heretofore instituted by a nonresident of
this State in which the defendant was personally
served with summons or in which the defendant
personally accepted service of the summons and the
case was tried and final judgment entered in a court
of this State in a county other than the county of
the defendant's residence, is hereby validated and
declared to be legal and proper, the same as if the
suit or action for divorce had been brought in the
county of the defendant's residence.
In all
divorce actions the complaint shall set forth the
name and age of any minor child or children of the
marriage, and in the event there are no minor
children of the marriage, the complaint shall so
state. In addition, when there are minor children of
the marriage, the complaint shall state the social
security number of the plaintiff and, if known, the
social security number of the defendant.
In
all prior suits and actions for divorce heretofore
instituted and tried in the courts of this State
where the averments of fact required to be contained
in the affidavit heretofore required by this section
are or have been alleged and set forth in the
complaint in said suits or actions and said
complaints have been duly verified as required by
Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, said
allegations so contained in said complaints shall be
deemed to be, and are hereby made, a substantial
compliance as to the allegations heretofore required
by this section to be set forth in any affidavit;
and all such suits or actions for divorce, as well
as the judgments or decrees issued and entered as a
result thereof, are hereby validated and declared to
be legal and proper judgments and decrees of
divorce.
In all suits and actions for divorce
heretofore instituted and tried in this State on and
subsequent to the 5th day of April, 1951, wherein
the statements, averments, or allegations in the
verification to the complaint in said suits or
actions are not in accordance with the provisions of
Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and G.S.
1‑148 or the requirements of this section as to
verification of complaint or the allegations,
statements or averments in the verification contain
the language that the facts set forth in the
complaint are true "to the best of affiant's
knowledge and belief" instead of the language "that
the same is true to his (or her) own knowledge" or
similar variation in language, said allegations,
statements and averments in said verifications as
contained in or attached to said complaint shall be
deemed to be, and are hereby made, a substantial
compliance as to the allegations, averments or
statements required by this section to be set forth
in any such verifications; and all such suits or
actions for divorce, as well as the judgments or
decrees issued and entered as a result thereof, are
hereby validated and declared to be legal and proper
judgments and decrees of divorce. The judgment of
divorce shall include, where there are minor
children of the parties, the social security numbers
of the parties. (1868‑9, c. 93, s. 46; 1869‑70, c.
184; Code, s. 1287; Rev., s. 1563; 1907, c. 1008, s.
1; C.S., s. 1661; 1925, c. 93; 1933, c. 71, ss. 2,
3; 1943, c. 448, s. 1; 1947, c. 165; 1949, c. 264,
s. 4; 1951, c. 590; 1955, c. 103; 1965, c. 636, s.
3; c. 751, s. 1; 1967, c. 50; c. 954, s. 3; 1969, c.
803; 1971, c. 415; 1973, c. 39; 1981, c. 599, s. 15;
1997‑433, s. 4.3; 1998‑17, s. 1.)
§
50‑9. Effect of answer of summons by defendant.
In all cases upon an action for a divorce
absolute, where judgment of divorce has heretofore
been granted and where the plaintiff has caused to
be served upon the defendant in person a legal
summons, whether by verified complaint or unverified
complaint, and such defendant answered such summons,
and where the trial of said action was duly and
legally had in all other respects and judgments
rendered by a judge of the superior court upon
issues answered by a judge and jury, in accordance
with law, such judgments are hereby declared to have
the same force and effect as any judgment upon an
action for divorce otherwise had legally and
regularly. (1929, c. 290, s. 1; 1947, c. 393.)
§ 50‑10. Material facts found by judge or
jury in divorce or annulment proceedings; when
notice of trial not required; procedure same as
ordinary civil actions.
- Except as provided for in subsection (e) of
this section, the material facts in every
complaint asking for a divorce or for an
annulment shall be deemed to be denied by the
defendant, whether the same shall be actually
denied by pleading or not, and no judgment shall
be given in favor of the plaintiff in any such
complaint until such facts have been found by a
judge or jury.
- Nothing herein shall require notice of trial
to be given to a defendant who has not made an
appearance in the action.
- The determination of whether there is to be
a jury trial or a trial before the judge without
a jury shall be made in accordance with G.S.
1A‑1, Rules 38 and 39.
- The provisions of G.S. 1A‑1, Rule 56, shall
be applicable to actions for absolute divorce
pursuant to G.S. 50‑6, for the purpose of
determining whether any genuine issue of
material fact remains for trial by jury, but in
the event the court determines that no genuine
issue of material fact remains for trial by
jury, the court must find the facts as provided
herein. The court may enter a judgment of
absolute divorce pursuant to the procedures set
forth in G.S. 1A‑1, Rule 56, finding all
requisite facts from nontestimonial evidence
presented by affidavit, verified motion or other
verified pleading.
- The clerk of superior court, upon request of
the plaintiff, may enter judgment in cases in
which the plaintiff's only claim against the
defendant is for absolute divorce, or absolute
divorce and the resumption of a former name, and
the defendant has been defaulted for failure to
appear, the defendant has answered admitting the
allegations of the complaint, or the defendant
has filed a waiver of the right to answer, and
the defendant is not an infant or incompetent
person. (1868‑9, c. 93, s. 47; Code, s. 1288;
Rev., s. 1564; C.S., s. 1662; 1963, c. 540, ss.
1, 2; 1965, c. 105; c. 636, s. 4; 1971, c. 17;
1973, cc. 2, 460; 1981, c. 12; 1983 (Reg. Sess.,
1984), c. 1037, s. 4; 1985, c. 140; 1991, c.
568, s. 1; 2004‑128, s. 6.)
§ 50‑11. Effects
of absolute divorce.
- After a judgment of divorce from the
bonds of matrimony, all rights arising out
of the marriage shall cease and determine
except as hereinafter set out, and either
party may marry again without restriction
arising from the dissolved marriage.
- No judgment of divorce shall render
illegitimate any child in esse, or begotten of
the body of the wife during coverture.
- A divorce obtained pursuant to G.S. 50‑5.1
or G.S. 50‑6 shall not affect the rights of
either spouse with respect to any action for
alimony or postseparation support pending at the
time the judgment for divorce is granted.
Furthermore, a judgment of absolute divorce
shall not impair or destroy the right of a
spouse to receive alimony or postseparation
support or affect any other rights provided for
such spouse under any judgment or decree of a
court rendered before or at the time of the
judgment of absolute divorce.
- A divorce obtained outside the State in an
action in which jurisdiction over the person of
the dependent spouse was not obtained shall not
impair or destroy the right of the dependent
spouse to alimony as provided by the laws of
this State.
- An absolute divorce obtained within this
State shall destroy the right of a spouse to
equitable distribution under G.S. 50‑20 unless
the right is asserted prior to judgment of
absolute divorce; except, the defendant may
bring an action or file a motion in the cause
for equitable distribution within six months
from the date of the judgment in such a case if
service of process upon the defendant was by
publication pursuant to G.S. 1A‑1, Rule 4 and
the defendant failed to appear in the action for
divorce.
- An absolute divorce by a court that lacked
personal jurisdiction over the absent spouse or
lacked jurisdiction to dispose of the property
shall not destroy the right of a spouse to
equitable distribution under G.S. 50‑20 if an
action or motion in the cause is filed within
six months after the judgment of divorce is
entered. The validity of such divorce may be
attacked in the action for equitable
distribution. (1871‑2, c. 193, s. 43; Code, s.
1295; Rev., s. 1569; 1919, c. 204; C.S., s.
1663; 1953, c. 1313; 1955, c. 872, s. 1; 1967,
c. 1152, s. 3; 1981, c. 190; c. 815, s. 2; 1987,
c. 844, s. 3; 1991, c. 569, s. 2; 1995, c. 319,
s. 8; 1998‑217, s. 7(a), (b).)
§
50‑11.1. Children born of voidable marriage
legitimate.
A child born of voidable marriage or a bigamous
marriage is legitimate notwithstanding the annulment
of the marriage. (1951, c. 893, s. 2.)
§ 50‑11.2. Judgment provisions pertaining to
care, custody, tuition and maintenance of minor
children.
Where the court has the requisite jurisdiction and
upon proper pleadings and proper and due notice to
all interested parties the judgment in a divorce
action may contain such provisions respecting care,
custody, tuition and maintenance of the minor
children of the marriage as the court may adjudge;
and from time to time such provisions may be
modified upon due notice and hearing and a showing
of a substantial change in condition; and if there
be no minor children, the judgment may so state. The
jurisdictional requirements of G.S. 50A‑201,
50A‑203, or 50A‑204 shall apply in regard to a
custody decree. (1973, c. 927, s. 1; 1979, c. 110,
s. 11; 1999‑223, s. 10.)
§ 50‑11.3. Certain judgments entered prior to
January 1, 1981, validated.
Any judgment of divorce which has been entered prior
to January 1, 1981, by a court of competent
jurisdiction within the State of North Carolina
without a conclusion of law that the plaintiff was
entitled to an absolute divorce, but which is proper
in all other respects, is hereby rendered valid and
of full force and effect. (1977, c. 320; 1981, c.
473.)
§ 50‑11.4. Certain judgments of divorce
validated.
Any judgment of divorce entered as a result of an
action instituted prior to October 1, 1983, upon any
grounds abolished by Chapter 613 of the 1983 Session
Laws as amended by Section 217(O) of Chapter 923 of
the 1983 Session Laws, which is proper in all other
respects, is hereby rendered valid and of full force
and effect. (1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 952.)
§ 50‑12. Resumption of maiden or premarriage
surname.
- Any woman whose marriage is dissolved by
a decree of absolute divorce may, upon
application to the clerk of court of the
county in which she resides or where the
divorce was granted setting forth her
intention to do so, change her name to any
of the following:
- Her maiden name; or
- The surname of a prior deceased husband; or
- The surname of a prior living husband if she
has children who have that husband's surname.
(a1) A man whose marriage is dissolved by
decree of absolute divorce may, upon
application to the clerk of court of the
county in which he resides or where the
divorce was granted setting forth his
intention to do so, change the surname he
took upon marriage to his premarriage
surname.
- The application shall be addressed to the
clerk of the court of the county in which such
divorced person resides or where the divorce was
granted, and shall set forth the full name of
the former spouse of the applicant, the name of
the county and state in which the divorce was
granted, and the term or session of court at
which such divorce was granted, and shall be
signed by the woman in her full maiden name, or
by the man in his full premarriage surname. The
clerks of court of the several counties of the
State shall record and index such applications
in such manner as shall be required by the
Administrative Office of the Courts.
- If an applicant, since the divorce, has
adopted one of the surnames listed in subsection
(a) or (a1) of this section, the applicant's use
and adoption of that name is validated.
- In the complaint, or counterclaim for
divorce filed by any person in this State, the
person may petition the court to adopt any
surname as provided by this section, and the
court is authorized to incorporate in the
divorce decree an order authorizing the person
to adopt that surname. (1937, c. 53; 1941, c. 9;
1951, c. 780; 1957, c. 394; 1971, c. 1185, s.
23; 1981, c. 494, ss. 1‑4; 1985, c. 488; 1993
(Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 565, s. 1; 2005‑38, s.
1.)
§
50‑13. Repealed by Session Laws 1967, c. 1153, s. 1.
§ 50‑13.1. Action or proceeding for custody of
minor child.
- Any parent, relative, or other person,
agency, organization or institution claiming
the right to custody of a minor child may
institute an action or proceeding for the
custody of such child, as hereinafter
provided. Any person whose actions resulted
in a conviction under G.S. 14‑27.2 or G.S.
14‑27.3 and the conception of the minor
child may not claim the right to custody of
that minor child. Unless a contrary intent
is clear, the word "custody" shall be deemed
to include custody or visitation or both.
- Whenever it appears to the court, from the
pleadings or otherwise, that an action involves
a contested issue as to the custody or
visitation of a minor child, the matter, where
there is a program established pursuant to G.S.
7A‑494, shall be set for mediation of the
unresolved issues as to custody and visitation
before or concurrent with the setting of the
matter for hearing unless the court waives
mediation pursuant to subsection (c). Issues
that arise in motions for contempt or for
modifications as well as in other pleadings
shall be set for mediation unless mediation is
waived by the court. Alimony, child support, and
other economic issues may not be referred for
mediation pursuant to this section. The purposes
of mediation under this section include the
pursuit of the following goals:
- To reduce any acrimony that exists between
the parties to a dispute involving custody or
visitation of a minor child;
- The development of custody and visitation
agreements that are in the child's best
interest;
- To provide the parties with informed choices
and, where possible, to give the parties the
responsibility for making decisions about child
custody and visitation;
- To provide a structured, confidential,
nonadversarial setting that will facilitate the
cooperative resolution of custody and visitation
disputes and minimize the stress and anxiety to
which the parties, and especially the child, are
subjected; and
- To reduce the relitigation of custody and
visitation disputes.
- For good cause, on the motion of either
party or on the court's own motion, the court
may waive the mandatory setting under Article
39A of Chapter 7A of the General Statutes of a
contested custody or visitation matter for
mediation. Good cause may include, but is not
limited to, the following: a showing of undue
hardship to a party; an agreement between the
parties for voluntary mediation, subject to
court approval; allegations of abuse or neglect
of the minor child; allegations of alcoholism,
drug abuse, or domestic violence between the
parents in common; or allegations of severe
psychological, psychiatric, or emotional
problems. A showing by either party that the
party resides more than fifty miles from the
court shall be considered good cause.
- Either party may move to have the mediation
proceedings dismissed and the action heard in
court due to the mediator's bias, undue
familiarity with a party, or other prejudicial
ground.
- Mediation proceeding shall be held in
private and shall be confidential. Except as
provided in this Article, all verbal or written
communications from either or both parties to
the mediator or between the parties in the
presence of the mediator made in a proceeding
pursuant to this section are absolutely
privileged and inadmissible in court. The
mediator may assess the needs and interests of
the child, and may interview the child or others
who are not parties to the proceedings when he
or she thinks appropriate.
- Neither the mediator nor any party or other
person involved in mediation sessions under this
section shall be competent to testify to
communications made during or in furtherance of
such mediation sessions; provided, there is no
privilege as to communications made in
furtherance of a crime or fraud. Nothing in this
subsection shall be construed as permitting an
individual to obtain immunity from prosecution
for criminal conduct or as excusing an
individual from the reporting requirements of
Article 3 of Chapter 7B of the General Statutes
or G.S. 108A‑102.
- Any agreement reached by the parties as a
result of the mediation shall be reduced to
writing, signed by each party, and submitted to
the court as soon as practicable. Unless the
court finds good reason not to, it shall
incorporate the agreement in a court order and
it shall become enforceable as a court order. If
some or all of the issues as to custody or
visitation are not resolved by mediation, the
mediator shall report that fact to the court.
- If an agreement that results from mediation
and is incorporated into a court order is
referred to as a "parenting agreement" or called
by some similar name, it shall nevertheless be
deemed to be a custody order or child custody
determination for purposes of Chapter 50A of the
General Statutes, G.S. 14‑320.1, G.S. 110‑139.1,
or other places where those terms appear.
- If the child whose custody is the subject of
an action under this Chapter also is the subject
of a juvenile abuse, neglect, or dependency
proceeding pursuant to Subchapter 1 of Chapter
7B of the General Statutes, then the custody
action under this Chapter is stayed as provided
in G.S. 7B‑200. (1967, c. 1153, s. 2; 1989, c.
795, s. 15(b); 1998‑202, s. 13(p); 2004‑128, s.
10; 2005‑320, s. 5; 2005‑423, s. 4.)
§ 50‑13.2. Who
entitled to custody; terms of custody; visitation
rights of grandparents; taking child out of State.
- An order for custody of a minor child
entered pursuant to this section shall award
the custody of such child to such person,
agency, organization or institution as will
best promote the interest and welfare of the
child. In making the determination, the
court shall consider all relevant factors
including acts of domestic violence between
the parties, the safety of the child, and
the safety of either party from domestic
violence by the other party and shall make
findings accordingly. An order for custody
must include findings of fact which support
the determination of what is in the best
interest of the child. Between the mother
and father, whether natural or adoptive, no
presumption shall apply as to who will
better promote the interest and welfare of
the child. Joint custody to the parents
shall be considered upon the request of
either parent.
- An order for custody of a minor child may
grant joint custody to the parents, exclusive
custody to one person, agency, organization, or
institution, or grant custody to two or more
persons, agencies, organizations, or
institutions. Any order for custody shall
include such terms, including visitation, as
will best promote the interest and welfare of
the child. If the court finds that domestic
violence has occurred, the court shall enter
such orders that best protect the children and
party who were the victims of domestic violence,
in accordance with the provisions of G.S.
50B‑3(a1)(1), (2), and (3). If a party is absent
or relocates with or without the children
because of an act of domestic violence, the
absence or relocation shall not be a factor that
weighs against the party in determining custody
or visitation. Absent an order of the court to
the contrary, each parent shall have equal
access to the records of the minor child
involving the health, education, and welfare of
the child.
(b1) An order for custody of a minor child may
provide visitation rights for any grandparent of
the child as the court, in its discretion, deems
appropriate. As used in this subsection,
"grandparent" includes a biological grandparent
of a child adopted by a stepparent or a relative
of the child where a substantial relationship
exists between the grandparent and the child.
Under no circumstances shall a biological
grandparent of a child adopted by adoptive
parents, neither of whom is related to the child
and where parental rights of both biological
parents have been terminated, be entitled to
visitation rights.
- An order for custody of a minor child may
provide for such child to be taken outside of
the State, but if the order contemplates the
return of the child to this State, the judge may
require the person, agency, organization or
institution having custody out of this State to
give bond or other security conditioned upon the
return of the child to this State in accordance
with the order of the court.
- If, within a reasonable time, one parent
fails to consent to adoption pursuant to Chapter
48 of the General Statutes or parental rights
have not been terminated, the consent of the
other consenting parent shall not be effective
in an action for custody of the child. (1957, c.
545; 1967, c. 1153, s. 2; 1977, c. 501, s. 2;
1979, c. 967; 1981, c. 735, ss. 1, 2; 1985, c.
575, s. 3; 1987, c. 541, s. 2; c. 776; 1995
(Reg. Sess., 1996), c. 591, s. 5; 2004‑186, s.
17.1.)
§
50‑13.2A. Action for visitation of an adopted
grandchild.
A biological grandparent may institute an action or
proceeding for visitation rights with a child
adopted by a stepparent or a relative of the child
where a substantial relationship exists between the
grandparent and the child. Under no circumstances
shall a biological grandparent of a child adopted by
adoptive parents, neither of whom is related to the
child and where parental rights of both biological
parents have been terminated, be entitled to
visitation rights. A court may award visitation
rights if it determines that visitation is in the
best interest of the child. An order awarding
visitation rights shall contain findings of fact
which support the determination by the judge of the
best interest of the child. Procedure, venue, and
jurisdiction shall be as in an action for custody.
(1985, c. 575, s. 2.)
§ 50‑13.3. Enforcement of order for custody.
- An order providing for the custody of a
minor child is enforceable by proceedings
for civil contempt, and its disobedience may
be punished by proceedings for criminal
contempt, as provided in Chapter 5A,
Contempt, of the General Statutes.
Notwithstanding the provisions of G.S.
1‑294, an order pertaining to child custody
which has been appealed to the appellate
division is enforceable in the trial court
by proceedings for civil contempt during the
pendency of the appeal. Upon motion of an
aggrieved party, the court of the appellate
division in which the appeal is pending may
stay any order for civil contempt entered
for child custody until the appeal is
decided, if justice requires.
- Any court of this State having jurisdiction
to make an award of custody of a minor child in
an action or proceeding therefor, shall have the
power of injunction in such action or proceeding
as provided in Article 37 of Chapter 1 of the
General Statutes and G.S. 1A‑1, Rule 65. (1967,
c. 1153, s. 2; 1969, c. 895, s. 16; 1977, c.
711, s. 26; 1983, c. 530, s. 2.)
§
50‑13.4. Action for support of minor child.
- Any parent, or any person, agency,
organization or institution having custody
of a minor child, or bringing an action or
proceeding for the custody of such child, or
a minor child by his guardian may institute
an action for the support of such child as
hereinafter provided.
- In the absence of pleading and proof that
the circumstances otherwise warrant, the father
and mother shall be primarily liable for the
support of a minor child. In the absence of
pleading and proof that the circumstances
otherwise warrant, parents of a minor,
unemancipated child who is the custodial or
noncustodial parent of a child shall share this
primary liability for their grandchild's support
with the minor parent, the court determining the
proper share, until the minor parent reaches the
age of 18 or becomes emancipated. If both the
parents of the child requiring support were
unemancipated minors at the time of the child's
conception, the parents of both minor parents
share primary liability for their grandchild's
support until both minor parents reach the age
of 18 or become emancipated. If only one parent
of the child requiring support was an
unemancipated minor at the time of the child's
conception, the parents of both parents are
liable for any arrearages in child support owed
by the adult or emancipated parent until the
other parent reaches the age of 18 or becomes
emancipated. In the absence of pleading and
proof that the circumstances otherwise warrant,
any other person, agency, organization or
institution standing in loco parentis shall be
secondarily liable for such support. Such other
circumstances may include, but shall not be
limited to, the relative ability of all the
above‑mentioned parties to provide support or
the inability of one or more of them to provide
support, and the needs and estate of the child.
The judge may enter an order requiring any one
or more of the above‑mentioned parties to
provide for the support of the child as may be
appropriate in the particular case, and if
appropriate the court may authorize the
application of any separate estate of the child
to his support. However, the judge may not order
support to be paid by a person who is not the
child's parent or an agency, organization or
institution standing in loco parentis absent
evidence and a finding that such person, agency,
organization or institution has voluntarily
assumed the obligation of support in writing.
The preceding sentence shall not be construed to
prevent any court from ordering the support of a
child by an agency of the State or county which
agency may be responsible under law for such
support.
The judge may order responsible parents in a
IV‑D establishment case to perform a job search,
if the responsible parent is not incapacitated.
This includes IV‑D cases in which the
responsible parent is a noncustodial mother or a
noncustodial father whose affidavit of parentage
has been filed with the court or when paternity
is not at issue for the child. The court may
further order the responsible parent to
participate in work activities, as defined in 42
U.S.C. § 607, as the court deems appropriate.
- Payments ordered for the support of a minor
child shall be in such amount as to meet the
reasonable needs of the child for health,
education, and maintenance, having due regard to
the estates, earnings, conditions, accustomed
standard of living of the child and the parties,
the child care and homemaker contributions of
each party, and other facts of the particular
case. Payments ordered for the support of a
minor child shall be on a monthly basis, due and
payable on the first day of each month. The
requirement that orders be established on a
monthly basis does not affect the availability
of garnishment of disposable earnings based on
an obligor's pay period.
The court shall determine the amount of child
support payments by applying the presumptive
guidelines established pursuant to subsection
(c1) of this section. However, upon request of
any party, the Court shall hear evidence, and
from the evidence, find the facts relating to
the reasonable needs of the child for support
and the relative ability of each parent to
provide support. If, after considering the
evidence, the Court finds by the greater weight
of the evidence that the application of the
guidelines would not meet or would exceed the
reasonable needs of the child considering the
relative ability of each parent to provide
support or would be otherwise unjust or
inappropriate the Court may vary from the
guidelines. If the court orders an amount other
than the amount determined by application of the
presumptive guidelines, the court shall make
findings of fact as to the criteria that justify
varying from the guidelines and the basis for
the amount ordered.
Payments ordered for the support of a child
shall terminate when the child reaches the age
of 18 except:
- If the child is otherwise emancipated,
payments shall terminate at that time;
- If the child is still in primary or
secondary school when the child reaches age 18,
support payments shall continue until the child
graduates, otherwise ceases to attend school on
a regular basis, fails to make satisfactory
academic progress towards graduation, or reaches
age 20, whichever comes first, unless the court
in its discretion orders that payments cease at
age 18 or prior to high school graduation.
In the case of graduation, or attaining age
20, payments shall terminate without order by
the court, subject to the right of the party
receiving support to show, upon motion and with
notice to the opposing party, that the child has
not graduated or attained the age of 20.
If an arrearage for child support or fees due
exists at the time that a child support
obligation terminates, payments shall continue
in the same total amount that was due under the
terms of the previous court order or income
withholding in effect at the time of the support
obligation. The total amount of these payments
is to be applied to the arrearage until all
arrearages and fees are satisfied or until
further order of the court.
(c1) Effective July 1, 1990, the Conference of
Chief District Judges shall prescribe uniform
statewide presumptive guidelines for the
computation of child support obligations of each
parent as provided in Chapter 50 or elsewhere in
the General Statutes and shall develop criteria
for determining when, in a particular case,
application of the guidelines would be unjust or
inappropriate. Prior to May 1, 1990 these
guidelines and criteria shall be reported to the
General Assembly by the Administrative Office of
the Courts by delivering copies to the President
Pro Tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the
House of Representatives. The purpose of the
guidelines and criteria shall be to ensure that
payments ordered for the support of a minor
child are in such amount as to meet the
reasonable needs of the child for health,
education, and maintenance, having due regard to
the estates, earnings, conditions, accustomed
standard of living of the child and the parties,
the child care and homemaker contributions of
each party, and other facts of the particular
case. The guidelines shall include a procedure
for setting child support, if any, in a joint or
shared custody arrangement which shall reflect
the other statutory requirements herein.
Periodically, but at least once every four
years, the Conference of Chief District Judges
shall review the guidelines to determine whether
their application results in appropriate child
support award amounts. The Conference may modify
the guidelines accordingly. The Conference shall
give the Department of Health and Human
Services, the Administrative Office of the
Courts, and the general public an opportunity to
provide the Conference with information relevant
to the development and review of the guidelines.
Any modifications of the guidelines or criteria
shall be reported to the General Assembly by the
Administrative Office of the Courts before they
become effective by delivering copies to the
President Pro Tempore of the Senate and the
Speaker of the House of Representatives. The
guidelines, when adopted or modified, shall be
provided to the Department of Health and Human
Services and the Administrative Office of the
Courts, which shall disseminate them to the
public through local IV‑D offices, clerks of
court, and the media.
Until July 1, 1990,
the advisory guidelines adopted by the
Conference of Chief District Judges pursuant to
this subsection as formerly written shall
operate as presumptive guidelines and the
factors adopted by the Conference of Chief
District Judges pursuant to this subsection as
formerly written shall constitute criteria for
varying from the amount of support determined by
the guidelines.
- In non‑IV‑D cases, payments for the support
of a minor child shall be ordered to be paid to
the person having custody of the child or any
other proper person, agency, organization or
institution, or to the State Child Support
Collection and Disbursement Unit, for the
benefit of the child. In IV‑D cases, payments
for the support of a minor child shall be
ordered to be paid to the State Child Support
Collection and Disbursement Unit for the benefit
of the child.
(d1) For child support
orders initially entered on or after January 1,
1994, the immediate income withholding
provisions of G.S. 110‑136.5(c1) shall apply.
- Payment for the support of a minor child
shall be paid by lump sum payment, periodic
payments, or by transfer of title or possession
of personal property of any interest therein, or
a security interest in or possession of real
property, as the court may order. The court may
order the transfer of title to real property
solely owned by the obligor in payment of
arrearages of child support so long as the net
value of the interest in the property being
transferred does not exceed the amount of the
arrearage being satisfied. In every case in
which payment for the support of a minor child
is ordered and alimony or postseparation support
is also ordered, the order shall separately
state and identify each allowance.
(e1) In IV‑D cases, the order for child support
shall provide that the clerk shall transfer the
case to another jurisdiction in this State if
the IV‑D agency requests the transfer on the
basis that the obligor, the custodian of the
child, and the child do not reside in the
jurisdiction in which the order was issued. The
IV‑D agency shall provide notice of the transfer
to the obligor by delivery of written notice in
accordance with the notice requirements of
Chapter 1A‑1, Rule 5(b) of the Rules of Civil
Procedure. The clerk shall transfer the case to
the jurisdiction requested by the IV‑D agency,
which shall be a jurisdiction in which the
obligor, the custodian of the child, or the
child resides. Nothing in this subsection shall
be construed to prevent a party from contesting
the transfer.
- Remedies for enforcement of support of minor
children shall be available as herein provided.
- The court may require the person ordered to
make payments for the support of a minor child
to secure the same by means of a bond, mortgage
or deed of trust, or any other means ordinarily
used to secure an obligation to pay money or
transfer property, or by requiring the execution
of an assignment of wages, salary or other
income due or to become due.
- If the court requires the transfer of real
or personal property or an interest therein as
provided in subsection (e) as a part of an order
for payment of support for a minor child, or for
the securing thereof, the court may also enter
an order which shall transfer title as provided
in G.S. 1A‑1, Rule 70 and G.S. 1‑228.
- The remedy of arrest and bail, as provided
in Article 34 of Chapter 1 of the General
Statutes, shall be available in actions for
child‑support payments as in other cases.
- The remedies of attachment and garnishment,
as provided in Article 35 of Chapter 1 of the
General Statutes, shall be available in an
action for child‑support payments as in other
cases, and for such purposes the child or person
bringing an action for child support shall be
deemed a creditor of the defendant.
Additionally, in accordance with the provisions
of G.S. 110‑136, a continuing wage garnishment
proceeding for wages due or to become due may be
instituted by motion in the original child
support proceeding or by independent action
through the filing of a petition.
- The remedy of injunction, as provided in
Article 37 of Chapter 1 of the General Statutes
and G.S. 1A‑1, Rule 65, shall be available in
actions for child support as in other cases.
- Receivers, as provided in Article 38 of
Chapter 1 of the General Statutes, may be
appointed in action for child support as in
other cases.
- A minor child or other person for whose
benefit an order for the payment of child
support has been entered shall be a creditor
within the meaning of Article 3A of Chapter 39
of the General Statutes pertaining to fraudulent
conveyances.
- Except as provided in Article 15 of Chapter
44 of the General Statutes, a judgment for child
support shall not be a lien against real
property unless the judgment expressly so
provides, sets out the amount of the lien in a
sum certain, and adequately describes the real
property affected; but past due periodic
payments may by motion in the cause or by a
separate action be reduced to judgment which
shall be a lien as other judgments and may
include provisions for periodic payments.
- An order for the periodic payments of child
support or a child support judgment that
provides for periodic payments is enforceable by
proceedings for civil contempt, and disobedience
may be punished by proceedings for criminal
contempt, as provided in Chapter 5A of the
General Statutes.
Notwithstanding the
provisions of G.S. 1‑294, an order for the
payment of child support which has been appealed
to the appellate division is enforceable in the
trial court by proceedings for civil contempt
during the pendency of the appeal. Upon motion
of an aggrieved party, the court of the
appellate division in which the appeal is
pending may stay any order for civil contempt
entered for child support until the appeal is
decided, if justice requires.
- The remedies provided by Chapter 1 of the
General Statutes, Article 28, Execution; Article
29B, Execution Sales; and Article 31,
Supplemental Proceedings, shall be available for
the enforcement of judgments for child support
as in other cases, but amounts so payable shall
not constitute a debt as to which property is
exempt from execution as provided in Article 16
of Chapter 1C of the General Statutes.
- The specific enumeration of remedies in this
section shall not constitute a bar to remedies
otherwise available.
- An individual who brings an action or motion
in the cause for the support of a minor child,
and the individual who defends the action, shall
provide to the clerk of the court in which the
action is brought or the order is issued, the
individual's social security number. The child
support order shall contain the social security
number of the parties as evidenced in the
support proceeding.
- Child support orders initially entered or
modified on and after October 1, 1998, shall
contain the name of each of the parties, the
date of birth of each party, the social security
number of each party, and the court docket
number. The Administrative Office of the Courts
shall transmit to the Department of Health and
Human Services, Child Support Enforcement
Program, on a timely basis, the information
required to be included on orders under this
subsection. (1967, c. 1153, s. 2; 1969, c. 895,
s. 17; 1975, c. 814; 1977, c. 711, s. 26; 1979,
c. 386, s. 10; 1981, c. 472; c. 613, ss. 1, 3;
1983, c. 54; c. 530, s. 1; 1985, c. 689, s. 17;
1985 (Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 1016; 1989, c. 529,
ss. 1, 2; 1989 (Reg. Sess., 1990), c. 1067, s.
2; 1993, c. 335, s. 1; c. 517, s. 5; 1995, c.
319, s. 9; c. 518, s. 1; 1997‑433, ss. 2.1(a),
2.2, 4.4, 7.1; 1997‑443, ss. 11A.118(a),
11A.122; 1998‑17, s. 1; 1998‑176, s. 1;
1999‑293, ss. 3, 4; 1999‑456, s. 13; 2001‑237,
s. 1; 2003‑288, s. 1.)
§
50‑13.5. Procedure in actions for custody or support
of minor children.
- Procedure. – The procedure in actions
for custody and support of minor children
shall be as in civil actions, except as
provided in this section and in G.S. 50‑19.
In this G.S. 50‑13.5 the words "custody and
support" shall be deemed to include custody
or support, or both.
- Type of Action. – An action brought under
the provisions of this section may be maintained
as follows:
- As a civil action.
- Repealed by Session Laws 1979, c. 110, s.
12.
- Joined with an action for annulment, or an
action for divorce, either absolute or from bed
and board, or an action for alimony without
divorce.
- As a cross action in an action for
annulment, or an action for divorce, either
absolute or from bed and board, or an action for
alimony without divorce.
- By motion in the cause in an action for
annulment, or an action for divorce, either
absolute or from bed and board, or an action for
alimony without divorce.
- Upon the court's own motion in an action for
annulment, or an action for divorce, either
absolute or from bed and board, or an action for
alimony without divorce.
- In any of the foregoing the judge may issue
an order requiring that the body of the minor
child be brought before him.
- Jurisdiction in Actions or Proceedings for
Child Support and Child Custody. –
- The jurisdiction of the courts of this State
to enter orders providing for the support of a
minor child shall be as in actions or
proceedings for the payment of money or the
transfer of property.
- The courts of this State shall have
jurisdiction to enter orders providing for the
custody of a minor child under the provisions of
G.S. 50A‑201, 50A‑202, and 50A‑204.
- through (6) Repealed by Session Laws 1979,
c. 110, s. 12.
- Service of Process; Notice; Interlocutory
Orders. –
- Service of process in civil actions for the
custody of minor children shall be as in other
civil actions. Motions for support of a minor
child in a pending action may be made on 10 days
notice to the other parties and compliance with
G.S. 50‑13.5(e). Motions for custody of a minor
child in a pending action may be made on 10 days
notice to the other parties and after compliance
with G.S. 50A‑205.
- If the circumstances of the case render it
appropriate, upon gaining jurisdiction of the
minor child the court may enter orders for the
temporary custody and support of the child,
pending the service of process or notice as
herein provided.
- A temporary order for custody which changes
the living arrangements of a child or changes
custody shall not be entered ex parte and prior
to service of process or notice, unless the
court finds that the child is exposed to a
substantial risk of bodily injury or sexual
abuse or that there is a substantial risk that
the child may be abducted or removed from the
State of North Carolina for the purpose of
evading the jurisdiction of North Carolina
courts.
- Notice to Additional Persons in Support
Actions and Proceedings; Intervention. –
- The parents of the minor child whose
addresses are reasonably ascertainable; any
person, agency, organization or institution
having actual care, control, or custody of a
minor child; and any person, agency,
organization or institution required by court
order to provide for the support of a minor
child, either in whole or in part, not named as
parties and served with process in an action or
proceeding for the support of such child, shall
be given notice by the party raising the issue
of support.
- The notice herein required shall be in the
manner provided by the Rules of Civil Procedure
for the service of notices in actions. Such
notice shall advise the person to be notified of
the name of the child, the names of the parties
to the action or proceeding, the court in which
the action or proceeding was instituted, and the
date thereof.
- In the discretion of the court, failure of
such service of notice shall not affect the
validity of any order or judgment entered in
such action or proceeding.
- Any person required to be given notice as
herein provided may intervene in an action or
proceeding for support of a minor child by
filing in apt time notice of appearance or other
appropriate pleadings.
- Venue. – An action or proceeding in the
courts of this State for custody and support of
a minor child may be maintained in the county
where the child resides or is physically present
or in a county where a parent resides, except as
hereinafter provided. If an action for
annulment, for divorce, either absolute or from
bed and board, or for alimony without divorce
has been previously instituted in this State,
until there has been a final judgment in such
case, any action or proceeding for custody and
support of the minor children of the marriage
shall be joined with such action or be by motion
in the cause in such action. If an action or
proceeding for the custody and support of a
minor child has been instituted and an action
for annulment or for divorce, either absolute or
from bed and board, or for alimony without
divorce is subsequently instituted in the same
or another county, the court having jurisdiction
of the prior action or proceeding may, in its
discretion direct that the action or proceeding
for custody and support of a minor child be
consolidated with such subsequent action, and in
the event consolidation is ordered, shall
determine in which court such consolidated
action or proceeding shall be heard.
- Custody and Support Irrespective of Parents'
Rights Inter Partes. – Orders for custody and
support of minor children may be entered when
the matter is before the court as provided by
this section, irrespective of the rights of the
wife and the husband as between themselves in an
action for annulment or an action for divorce,
either absolute or from bed and board, or an
action for alimony without divorce.
- Court Having Jurisdiction. – When a district
court having jurisdiction of the matter shall
have been established, actions or proceedings
for custody and support of minor children shall
be heard without a jury by the judge of such
district court, and may be heard at any time.
- District Court; Denial of Parental
Visitation Right; Written Finding of Fact. – In
any case in which an award of child custody is
made in a district court, the trial judge, prior
to denying a parent the right of reasonable
visitation, shall make a written finding of fact
that the parent being denied visitation rights
is an unfit person to visit the child or that
such visitation rights are not in the best
interest of the child.
- Custody and Visitation Rights of
Grandparents. – In any action in which the
custody of a minor child has been determined,
upon a motion in the cause and a showing of
changed circumstances pursuant to G.S. 50‑13.7,
the grandparents of the child are entitled to
such custody or visitation rights as the court,
in its discretion, deems appropriate. As used in
this subsection, "grandparent" includes a
biological grandparent of a child adopted by a
stepparent or a relative of the child where a
substantial relationship exists between the
grandparent and the child. Under no
circumstances shall a biological grandparent of
a child adopted by adoptive parents, neither of
whom is related to the child and where parental
rights of both biological parents have been
terminated, be entitled to visitation rights.
(1858‑9, c. 53, s. 2; 1871‑2, c. 193, ss. 39,
46; Code, ss. 1292, 1296, 1570, 1662; Rev., ss.
1567, 1570, 1854; 1919, c. 24; C.S., ss. 1664,
1667, 2242; 1921, c. 13; 1923, c. 52; 1939, c.
115; 1941, c. 120; 1943, c. 194; 1949, c. 1010;
1951, c. 893, s. 3; 1953, cc. 813, 925; 1955,
cc. 814, 1189; 1957, c. 545; 1965, c. 310, s. 2;
1967, c. 1153, s. 2; 1971, c. 1185, s. 24; 1973,
c. 751; 1979, c. 110, s. 12; c. 563; c. 709, s.
3; 1981, c. 735, s. 3; 1983, c. 587; 1985, c.
575, s. 4; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 893, s.
3.1; 1999‑223, ss. 11, 12.)
§
50‑13.6. Counsel fees in actions for custody and
support of minor children.
In an action or proceeding for the custody or
support, or both, of a minor child, including a
motion in the cause for the modification or
revocation of an existing order for custody or
support, or both, the court may in its discretion
order payment of reasonable attorney's fees to an
interested party acting in good faith who has
insufficient means to defray the expense of the
suit. Before ordering payment of a fee in a support
action, the court must find as a fact that the party
ordered to furnish support has refused to provide
support which is adequate under the circumstances
existing at the time of the institution of the
action or proceeding; provided however, should the
court find as a fact that the supporting party has
initiated a frivolous action or proceeding the court
may order payment of reasonable attorney's fees to
an interested party as deemed appropriate under the
circumstances. (1967, c. 1153, s. 2; 1973, c. 323.)
§ 50‑13.7. Modification of order for child
support or custody.
- An order of a court of this State for
support of a minor child may be modified or
vacated at any time, upon motion in the
cause and a showing of changed circumstances
by either party or anyone interested subject
to the limitations of G.S. 50‑13.10. Subject
to the provisions of G.S. 50A‑201, 50A‑202,
and 50A‑204, an order of a court of this
State for custody of a minor child may be
modified or vacated at any time, upon motion
in the cause and a showing of changed
circumstances by either party or anyone
interested.
- When an order for support of a minor child
has been entered by a court of another state, a
court of this State may, upon gaining
jurisdiction, and upon a showing of changed
circumstances, enter a new order for support
which modifies or supersedes such order for
support, subject to the limitations of G.S.
50‑13.10. Subject to the provisions of G.S.
50A‑201, 50A‑202, and 50A‑204, when an order for
custody of a minor child has been entered by a
court of another state, a court of this State
may, upon gaining jurisdiction, and a showing of
changed circumstances, enter a new order for
custody which modifies or supersedes such order
for custody. (1858‑9, c. 53; 1868‑9, c. 116, s.
36; 1871‑2, c. 193, s. 46; Code, ss. 1296, 1570,
1661; Rev., ss. 1570, 1853; C.S., ss. 1664,
2241; 1929, c. 270, s. 1; 1939, c. 115; 1941, c.
120; 1943, c. 194; 1949, c. 1010; 1953, c. 813;
1957, c. 545; 1965, c. 310, s. 2; 1967, c. 1153,
s. 2; 1979, c. 110, s. 13; 1981, c. 682, s. 12;
1987, c. 739, s. 3; 1999‑223, s. 13.)
§
50‑13.8. Custody of persons incapable of
self‑support upon reaching majority.
For the purposes of custody, the rights of a person
who is mentally or physically incapable of
self‑support upon reaching his majority shall be the
same as a minor child for so long as he remains
mentally or physically incapable of self‑support.
(1967, c. 1153, s. 2; 1971, c. 218, s. 3; 1973, c.
476, s. 133; 1979, c. 838, s. 29; 1989, c. 210.)
§ 50‑13.9. (Effective until July 1, 2007)
Procedure to insure payment of child support.
- Upon its own motion or upon motion of
either party, the court may order at any
time that support payments be made to the
State Child Support Collection and
Disbursement Unit for remittance to the
party entitled to receive the payments. For
child support orders initially entered on or
after January 1, 1994, the immediate income
withholding provisions of G.S. 110‑136.5(c1)
apply.
- After entry of an order by the court
under subsection (a) of this section, the
State Child Support Collection and
Disbursement Unit shall transmit child
support payments that are made to it to the
custodial parent or other party entitled to
receive them, unless a court order requires
otherwise.
(b1) In a IV‑D case:
- The designated child support enforcement
agency shall have the sole responsibility
and authority for monitoring the obligor's
compliance with all child support orders in
the case and for initiating any enforcement
procedures that it considers appropriate.
- The clerk of court shall maintain all
official records in the case.
- The designated child support enforcement
agency shall maintain any other records
needed to monitor the obligor's compliance
with or to enforce the child support orders
in the case, including records showing the
amount of each payment of child support
received from or on behalf of the obligor,
along with the dates on which each payment
was received. In any action establishing,
enforcing, or modifying a child support
order, the payment records maintained by the
designated child support agency shall be
admissible evidence, and the court shall
permit the designated representative to
authenticate those records.
(b2) In a non‑IV‑D case:
- The clerk of court shall have the
responsibility and authority for monitoring
the obligor's compliance with all child
support orders in the case and for
initiating any enforcement procedures that
it considers appropriate. The State Child
Support Collection and Disbursement Unit
shall notify the clerk of court of all
payments made in non‑IV‑D cases so that the
clerk of court can initiate enforcement
proceedings as provided in subsection (d) of
this section.
- The clerk of court shall maintain all
official records in the case.
- The clerk of court shall maintain any
other records needed to monitor the
obligor's compliance with or to enforce the
child support orders in the case, including
records showing the amount of each payment
of child support received from or on behalf
of the obligor, along with the dates on
which each payment was received.
- (c) In a non‑IV‑D case, the parties
affected by the order shall inform the clerk
of court of any change of address or of
other condition that may affect the
administration of the order. In a IV‑D case,
the parties affected by the order shall
inform the designated child support
enforcement agency of any change of address
or other condition that may affect the
administration of the order. The court may
provide in the order that a party failing to
inform the court or, as appropriate, the
designated child support enforcement agency,
of a change of address within a reasonable
period of time may be held in civil
contempt.
- (d) In a non‑IV‑D case, when the clerk
of superior court is notified by the State
Child Support Collection and Disbursement
Unit that an obligor has failed to make a
required payment of child support and is in
arrears, the clerk of superior court shall
mail by regular mail to the last known
address of the obligor a notice of
delinquency. The notice shall set out the
amount of child support currently due and
shall demand immediate payment of that
amount. The notice shall also state that
failure to make immediate payment will
result in the issuance by the court of an
enforcement order requiring the obligor to
appear before a district court judge and
show cause why the support obligation should
not be enforced by income withholding,
contempt of court, revocation of licensing
privileges, or other appropriate means.
Failure to receive the delinquency notice is
not a defense in any subsequent proceeding.
Sending the notice of delinquency is in the
discretion of the clerk if the clerk has,
during the previous 12 months, sent a notice
or notices of delinquency to the obligor for
nonpayment, or if income withholding has
been implemented against the obligor or the
obligor has been previously found in
contempt for nonpayment under the same child
support order.
If the arrearage is not paid in full within
21 days after the mailing of the delinquency
notice, or without waiting the 21 days if
the clerk has elected not to mail a
delinquency notice for any of the reasons
provided in this subsection, the clerk shall
cause an enforcement order to be issued and
shall issue a notice of hearing before a
district court judge. The enforcement order
shall order the obligor to appear and show
cause why the obligor should not be
subjected to income withholding or adjudged
in contempt of court, or both, and shall
order the obligor to bring to the hearing
records and information relating to the
obligor's employment, the obligor's
licensing privileges, and the amount and
sources of the obligor's disposable income.
The enforcement order shall state:
- That the obligor is under a court order to
provide child support, the name of each child
for whose benefit support is due, and
information sufficient to identify the order;
- That the obligor is delinquent and the
amount of overdue support;
(2a) That the court may order the revocation of
some or all of the obligor's licensing
privileges if the obligor is delinquent in an
amount equal to the support due for one month;
- That the court may order income withholding
if the obligor is delinquent in an amount equal
to the support due for one month;
- That income withholding, if implemented,
will apply to the obligor's current payors and
all subsequent payors and will be continued
until terminated pursuant to G.S. 110‑136.10;
- That failure to bring to the hearing records
and information relating to his employment and
the amount and sources of his disposable income
will be grounds for contempt;
- That if income withholding is not an
available or appropriate remedy, the court may
determine whether the obligor is in contempt or
whether any other enforcement remedy is
appropriate.
The enforcement order may be signed by the
clerk or a district court judge, and shall be
served on the obligor pursuant to G.S. 1A‑1,
Rule 4, Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk
shall also notify the party to whom support is
owed of the pending hearing. The clerk may
withdraw the order to the supporting party upon
receipt of the delinquent payment. On motion of
the person to whom support is owed, with the
approval of the district court judge, if the
district court judge finds it is in the best
interest of the child, no enforcement order
shall be issued.
When the matter comes
before the court, the court shall proceed as in
the case of a motion for income withholding
under G.S. 110‑136.5. If income withholding is
not an available or adequate remedy, the court
may proceed with contempt, imposition of a lien,
or other available, appropriate enforcement
remedies.
This subsection shall apply
only to non‑IV‑D cases, except that the clerk
shall issue an enforcement order in a IV‑D case
when requested to do so by an IV‑D obligee.
-
The clerk of court shall maintain and make available
to the district court judge a list of attorneys who
are willing to undertake representation, pursuant to
this section, of persons to whom child support is
owed. No attorney shall be placed on such list
without his permission.
- At least seven days prior to an
enforcement hearing as set forth in
subsection (d), the clerk must notify the
district court judge of all cases to be
heard for enforcement at the next term, and
the judge shall appoint an attorney from the
list described in subsection (e) to
represent each party to whom support
payments are owed if the judge deems it to
be in the best interest of the child for
whom support is being paid, unless:
- The attorney of record for the party to whom
support payments are owed has notified the clerk
of court that he will appear for said party; or
- The party to whom support payments are owed
requests the judge not to appoint an attorney;
or
- An attorney for the enforcement of child
support obligations pursuant to Title IV, Part
D, of the Social Security Act as amended is
available.
The judge may order payment of reasonable
attorney's fees as provided in G.S. 50‑13.6.
- Nothing in this section shall preclude
the independent initiation by a party of
proceedings for civil contempt or for income
withholding. (1983, c. 677, s. 1; 1985 (Reg.
Sess., 1986), c. 949, ss. 3‑6; 1989, c. 479;
1993, c. 517, s. 6; c. 553, s. 67.1; 1995,
c. 444, s. 1; c. 538, s. 1.2; 1997‑443, s.
11A.118(a); 1999‑293, ss. 11‑14; 2001‑237,
s. 7.)
§
50‑13.9. (Effective July 1, 2007) Procedure to
insure payment of child support.
- Upon its own motion or upon motion of
either party, the court may order at any
time that support payments be made to the
State Child Support Collection and
Disbursement Unit for remittance to the
party entitled to receive the payments. For
child support orders initially entered on or
after January 1, 1994, the immediate income
withholding provisions of G.S. 110‑136.5(c1)
apply.
- After entry of an order by the court
under subsection (a) of this section, the
State Child Support Collection and
Disbursement Unit shall transmit child
support payments that are made to it to the
custodial parent or other party entitled to
receive them, unless a court order requires
otherwise.
(b1) In a IV‑D case:
- The designated child support enforcement
agency shall have the sole responsibility
and authority for monitoring the obligor's
compliance with all child support orders in
the case and for initiating any enforcement
procedures that it considers appropriate.
- The clerk of court shall maintain all
official records in the case.
- The designated child support enforcement
agency shall maintain any other records
needed to monitor the obligor's compliance
with or to enforce the child support orders
in the case, including records showing the
amount of each payment of child support
received from or on behalf of the obligor,
along with the dates on which each payment
was received. In any action establishing,
enforcing, or modifying a child support
order, the payment records maintained by the
designated child support agency shall be
admissible evidence, and the court shall
permit the designated representative to
authenticate those records.
(b2) In a non‑IV‑D case:
- Repealed by Session Laws 2005, ch. 389,
s. 1.
- The clerk of court shall maintain all
official records and all case data
concerning child support matters previously
enforced by the clerk of court.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2005, ch. 389,
s. 1.
- In a IV‑D case, the parties affected by
the order shall inform the designated child
support enforcement agency of any change of
address or other condition that may affect
the administration of the order. The court
may provide in the order that a party
failing to inform the court or, as
appropriate, the designated child support
enforcement agency, of a change of address
within a reasonable period of time may be
held in civil contempt.
- Upon affidavit of an obligee, the clerk
or a district court judge may order the
obligor to appear and show cause why the
obligor should not be subjected to income
withholding or adjudged in contempt of
court, or both. The order shall require the
obligor to appear and show cause why the
obligor should not be subjected to income
withholding or adjudged in contempt of
court, or both, and shall order the obligor
to bring to the hearing records and
information relating to the obligor's
employment, the obligor's licensing
privileges, and the amount and sources of
the obligor's disposable income. The order
shall state:
- That the obligor is under a court order
to provide child support, the name of each
child for whose benefit support is due, and
information sufficient to identify the
order;
- That the obligor is delinquent and the
amount of overdue support;
(2a) That
the court may order the revocation of some
or all of the obligor's licensing privileges
if the obligor is delinquent in an amount
equal to the support due for one month;
- That the court may order income
withholding if the obligor is delinquent in
an amount equal to the support due for one
month;
- That income withholding, if implemented,
will apply to the obligor's current payors
and all subsequent payors and will be
continued until terminated pursuant to G.S.
110‑136.10;
- That failure to bring to the hearing
records and information relating to his
employment and the amount and sources of his
disposable income will be grounds for
contempt;
- That if income withholding is not an
available or appropriate remedy, the court
may determine whether the obligor is in
contempt or whether any other enforcement
remedy is appropriate.
The order may be signed by the clerk or
a district court judge, and shall be served
on the obligor pursuant to G.S. 1A‑1, Rule
4, Rules of Civil Procedure. On motion of
the person to whom support is owed in a
non‑IV‑D case, with the approval of the
district court judge, if the district court
judge finds it is in the best interest of
the child, no order shall be issued.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2005, ch. 389,
s. 1.
- Repealed by Session Laws 2005, ch. 389,
s. 1.
- Nothing in this section shall preclude
the independent initiation by a party of
proceedings for civil contempt or for income
withholding. ( 1983, c. 677, s. 1; 1985
(Reg. Sess., 1986), c. 949, ss. 3‑6; 1989,
c. 479; 1993, c. 517, s. 6; c. 553, s. 67.1;
1995, c. 444, s. 1; c. 538, s. 1.2;
1997‑443, s. 11A.118(a); 1999‑293, ss.
11‑14; 2001‑237, s. 7; 2005‑389, s. 1.)
§ 50‑13.10. Past
due child support vested; not subject to retroactive
modification; entitled to full faith and credit.
- Each past due child support payment is
vested when it accrues and may not thereafter be
vacated, reduced, or otherwise modified in any
way for any reason, in this State or any other
state, except that a child support obligation
may be modified as otherwise provided by law,
and a vested past due payment is to that extent
subject to divestment, if, but only if, a
written motion is filed, and due notice is given
to all parties either:
- Before the payment is due or
- If the moving party is precluded by
physical disability, mental incapacity,
indigency, misrepresentation of another
party, or other compelling reason from
filing a motion before the payment is due,
then promptly after the moving party is no
longer so precluded.
- A past due child support payment which is
vested pursuant to G.S. 50‑13.10(a) is entitled,
as a judgment, to full faith and credit in this
State and any other state, with the full force,
effect, and attributes of a judgment of this
State, except that no arrearage shall be entered
on the judgment docket of the clerk of superior
court or become a lien on real estate, nor shall
execution issue thereon, except as provided in
G.S. 50‑13.4(f)(8) and (10).
- As used in this section, "child support
payment" includes all payments required by court
or administrative order in civil actions and
expedited process proceedings under this
Chapter, by court order in proceedings under
Chapter 49 of the General Statutes, and by
agreements entered into and approved by the
court under G.S. 110‑132 or G.S. 110‑133.
- For purposes of this section, a child
support payment or the relevant portion thereof,
is not past due, and no arrearage accrues:
- From and after the date of the death of the
minor child for whose support the payment, or
relevant portion, is made;
- From and after the date of the death of the
supporting party;
- During any period when the child is living
with the supporting party pursuant to a valid
court order or to an express or implied written
or oral agreement transferring primary custody
to the supporting party;
- During any period when the supporting party
is incarcerated, is not on work release, and has
no resources with which to make the payment.
- When a child support payment that is to be
made to the State Child Support Collection and
Disbursement Unit is not received by the Unit
when due, the payment is not a past due child
support payment for purposes of this section,
and no arrearage accrues, if the payment is
actually made to and received on time by the
party entitled to receive it and that receipt is
evidenced by a canceled check, money order, or
contemporaneously executed and dated written
receipt. Nothing in this section shall affect
the duties of the clerks or the IV‑D agency
under this Chapter or Chapter 110 of the General
Statutes with respect to payments not received
by the Unit on time, but the court, in any
action to enforce such a payment, may enter an
order directing the clerk or the IV‑D agency to
enter the payment on the clerk's or IV‑D
agency's records as having been made on time, if
the court finds that the payment was in fact
received by the party entitled to receive it as
provided in this subsection. (1987, c. 739, s.
4; 1999‑293, s. 15.)
§
50‑13.11. Orders and agreements regarding medical
support and health insurance coverage for minor
children.
- The court may order a parent of a minor
child or other responsible party to provide
medical support for the child, or the parties
may enter into a written agreement regarding
medical support for the child. An order or
agreement for medical support for the child may
require one or both parties to pay the medical,
hospital, dental, or other health care related
expenses.
(a1) The court shall order the parent of a minor
child or other responsible party to maintain
health insurance for the benefit of the child
when health insurance is available at a
reasonable cost. If health insurance is not
presently available at a reasonable cost, the
court shall order the parent of a minor child or
other responsible party to maintain health
insurance for the benefit of the child when
health insurance becomes available at a
reasonable cost. As used in this subsection,
health insurance is considered reasonable in
cost if it is employment related or other group
health insurance, regardless of service delivery
mechanism. The court may require one or both
parties to maintain dental insurance.
- The party ordered or under agreement to
provide health insurance shall provide written
notice of any change in the applicable insurance
coverage to the other party.
- The employer or insurer of the party
required to provide health, hospital, and dental
insurance shall release to the other party, upon
written request, any information on a minor
child's insurance coverage that the employer or
insurer may release to the party required to
provide health, hospital, and dental insurance.
- When a court order or agreement for health
insurance is in effect, the signature of either
party shall be valid authorization to the
insurer to process an insurance claim on behalf
of a minor child.
- If the party who is required to provide
health insurance fails to maintain the insurance
coverage for the minor child, the party shall be
liable for any health, hospital, or dental
expenses incurred from the date of the court
order or agreement that would have been covered
by insurance if it had been in force.
- When a noncustodial parent ordered to
provide health insurance changes employment and
health insurance coverage is available through
the new employer, the obligee shall notify the
new employer of the noncustodial parent's
obligation to provide health insurance for the
child. Upon receipt of notice from the obligee,
the new employer shall enroll the child in the
employer's health insurance plan. (1989 (Reg.
Sess., 1990), c. 1067, s. 1; 1991, c. 419, s. 2;
c. 761, s. 42; 1997‑433, s. 3.1; 1998‑17, s. 1;
2003‑288, s. 3.2.)
§
50‑13.12. Forfeiture of licensing privileges for
failure to pay child support or for failure to
comply with subpoena issued pursuant to child
support or paternity establishment proceedings.
- As used in this section, the term:
- "Licensing board" means a department,
division, agency, officer, board, or other unit
of state government that issues hunting,
fishing, trapping, drivers, or occupational
licenses or licensing privileges.
- "Licensing privilege" means the privilege of
an individual to be authorized to engage in an
activity as evidenced by hunting, fishing, or
trapping licenses, regular and commercial
drivers licenses, and occupational,
professional, and business licenses.
- "Obligee" means the individual or agency to
whom a duty of support is owed or the
individual's legal representative.
- "Obligor" means the individual who owes a
duty to make child support payments under a
court order.
- "Occupational license" means a license,
certificate, permit, registration, or any other
authorization issued by a licensing board that
allows an obligor to engage in an occupation or
profession.
- Upon a finding by the district court judge
that the obligor is willfully delinquent in
child support payments equal to at least one
month's child support, or upon a finding that a
person has willfully failed to comply with a
subpoena issued pursuant to a child support or
paternity establishment proceeding, and upon
findings as to any specific licensing privileges
held by the obligor or held by the person
subject to the subpoena, the court may revoke
some or all of such privileges until the obligor
shall have paid the delinquent amount in full,
or, as applicable, until the person subject to
the subpoena has complied with the subpoena. The
court may stay any such revocation pertaining to
the obligor upon conditions requiring the
obligor to make full payment of the delinquency
over time. Any such stay shall further be
conditioned upon the obligor's maintenance of
current child support. The court may stay the
revocation pertaining to the person subject to
the subpoena upon a finding that the person has
complied with or is no longer subject to the
subpoena. Upon an order revoking such privileges
of an obligor that does not stay the revocation,
the clerk of superior court shall notify the
appropriate licensing board that the obligor is
delinquent in child support payments and that
the obligor's licensing privileges are revoked
until such time as the licensing board receives
proof of certification by the clerk that the
obligor is no longer delinquent in child support
payments. Upon an order revoking such privileges
of a person subject to the subpoena that does
not stay the revocation, the clerk of superior
court shall notify the appropriate licensing
board that the person has failed to comply with
the subpoena issued pursuant to a child support
or paternity establishment proceeding and that
the person's licensing privileges are revoked
until such time as the licensing board receives
proof of certification by the clerk that the
person is in compliance with or no longer
subject to the subpoena.
- An obligor may file a request with the clerk
of superior court for certification that the
obligor is no longer delinquent in child support
payments upon submission of proof satisfactory
to the clerk that the obligor has paid the
delinquent amount in full. A person whose
licensing privileges have been revoked under
subsection (b) of this section because of a
willful failure to comply with a subpoena may
file a request with the clerk of superior court
for certification that the person has met the
requirements of or is no longer subject to the
subpoena. The clerk shall provide a form to be
used for a request for certification. If the
clerk finds that the obligor has met the
requirements for reinstatement under this
subsection, then the clerk shall certify that
the obligor is no longer delinquent and shall
provide a copy of the certification to the
obligor. Upon request of the obligor, the clerk
shall mail a copy of the certification to the
appropriate licensing board. If the clerk finds
that the person whose licensing privileges have
been revoked under subsection (b) of this
section for failure to comply with a subpoena
has complied with or is no longer subject to the
subpoena, then the clerk shall certify that the
person has met the requirements of or is no
longer subject to the subpoena and shall provide
a copy of the certification to the person. Upon
request of the person, the clerk shall mail a
copy of the certification to the appropriate
licensing board.
- If licensing privileges are revoked under
this section, the obligor may petition the
district court for a reinstatement of such
privileges. The court may order the privileges
reinstated conditioned upon full payment of the
delinquency over time. Any order allowing
license reinstatement shall additionally require
the obligor's maintenance of current child
support. If the licensing privileges of a person
other than the obligor are revoked under this
section for failure to comply with a subpoena,
the person may petition the district court for
reinstatement of the privileges. The court may
order the privileges reinstated if the person
has complied with or is no longer subject to the
subpoena that was the basis for revocation. Upon
reinstatement under this subsection, the clerk
of superior court shall certify that the obligor
is no longer delinquent and provide a copy of
the certification to the obligor. Upon request
of the obligor, the clerk shall mail a copy of
the certification to the appropriate licensing
board. Upon reinstatement of the person whose
licensing privileges were revoked based on
failure to comply with a subpoena, the clerk of
superior court shall certify that the person has
complied with or is no longer subject to the
subpoena. Upon request of the person whose
licensing privileges are reinstated, the clerk
shall mail a copy of the certification to the
appropriate licensing board.
- An obligor or other person whose licensing
privileges are reinstated under this section may
provide a copy of the certification set forth in
either subsection (c) or (d) to each licensing
agency to which the obligor or other person
applies for reinstatement of licensing
privileges. Upon request of the obligor or other
person, the clerk shall mail a copy of the
certification to the appropriate licensing
board. Upon receipt of a copy of the
certification, the licensing board shall
reinstate the license.
- Upon receipt of notification by the clerk
that an obligor's or other person's licensing
privileges are revoked pursuant to this section,
the board shall note the revocation on its
records and take all necessary steps to
implement and enforce the revocation. These
steps shall not include the board's independent
revocation process pursuant to Chapter 150B of
the General Statutes, the Administrative
Procedure Act, which process is replaced by the
court process prescribed by this section. The
revocation pertaining to an obligor shall remain
in full force and effect until the board
receives certification under this section that
the obligor is no longer delinquent in child
support payments. The revocation pertaining to
the person whose licensing privileges were
revoked on the basis of failure to comply with a
subpoena shall remain in full force and effect
until the board receives certification of
reinstatement under subsection (d) of this
section. (1995, c. 538, ss. 1, 1.1; 1997‑433, s.
5.3; 1998‑17, s. 1.)
§§ 50‑14 through 50‑15. Repealed by Session Laws
1967, c. 1152, s. 1.
§ 50‑16. Repealed by Session Laws 1967, c. 1152,
s. 1; c. 1153. s. 1.
§ 50‑16.1: Repealed by Session Laws 1995, c. 319,
s. 1.
§ 50‑16.1A. Definitions.
As used in this Chapter, unless the context clearly
requires otherwise, the following definitions apply:
- "Alimony" means an order for payment for the
support and maintenance of a spouse or former
spouse, periodically or in a lump sum, for a
specified or for an indefinite term, ordered in
an action for divorce, whether absolute or from
bed and board, or in an action for alimony
without divorce.
- "Dependent spouse" means a spouse, whether
husband or wife, who is actually substantially
dependent upon the other spouse for his or her
maintenance and support or is substantially in
need of maintenance and support from the other
spouse.
- "Marital misconduct" means any of the
following acts that occur during the marriage
and prior to or on the date of separation:
- Illicit sexual behavior. For the purpose of
this section, illicit sexual behavior means acts
of sexual or deviate sexual intercourse, deviate
sexual acts, or sexual acts defined in G.S.
14‑27.1(4), voluntarily engaged in by a spouse
with someone other than the other spouse;
- Involuntary separation of the spouses in
consequence of a criminal act committed prior to
the proceeding in which alimony is sought;
- Abandonment of the other spouse;
- Malicious turning out‑of‑doors of the other
spouse;
- Cruel or barbarous treatment endangering the
life of the other spouse;
- Indignities rendering the condition of the
other spouse intolerable and life burdensome;
- Reckless spending of the income of eith
|